Wyoming Governor Calls for Inquiry into 'Aggressive' Actions of Trump Administration's Election Monitors
Wyoming Governor Mark Gordon has raised concerns over the conduct of election monitors deployed by the Trump administration during the state's recent primary elections. Gordon, a R
Wyoming Governor Mark Gordon has raised concerns over the conduct of election monitors deployed by the Trump administration during the state's recent primary elections. Gordon, a Republican, has requested his attorney general to investigate the monitors' "aggressive" behavior, which he described as "irregular" and "a bit aggressive."
The Justice Department sent two Civil Rights Division attorneys to Laramie County, Wyoming, which includes the state capital of Cheyenne, to observe the primary election. However, Gordon said that some state officials, including the attorney general, were not informed of the move in advance. "It sounded like the behavior of the observers was a bit aggressive," he said during a state canvassing board meeting on Wednesday.
The DOJ has defended its election monitoring practices, stating that voters deserve absolute confidence in the security of their ballots and the integrity of the voting process. "We are working alongside local officials to ensure every lawful vote is protected," Wyoming US Attorney Darin Smith said in an August 18 statement.
Gordon's criticism follows President Donald Trump's continued efforts to sow doubt about elections. Trump has repeatedly made unfounded claims of election fraud, including allegations of cheating in the Los Angeles mayoral primary election earlier this year. He also continues to falsely claim that the 2020 election was rigged, despite no evidence to support his claims.
Democrats and voting rights activists raised concerns last year that the monitors could be used to undermine the voting process or to cast doubt on the results of the election. Despite these concerns, the Trump administration maintained that the monitors were being sent out in line with decades-long federal monitoring practices.
Gordon said he is not against the concept of election monitors but expressed concerns that the behavior of the monitors deployed to Wyoming "seemed to exceed what the authority that Congress had given them was." "I'm not saying anything went wrong or anything else, and I certainly think that the conduct of this election was phenomenal," he said. "But I don't like the federal government coming in and taking our votes."
The DOJ has said it has sent more than 80 monitors to seven states so far this year for primary elections and plans to send about 1,000 monitors to polling sites in November. The department's election monitoring efforts have been met with mixed reactions across the country, with some officials and voters welcoming the added oversight and others expressing concern about the potential for political interference.
The situation in Wyoming highlights the ongoing debate over the role of the federal government in overseeing state elections. As the 2026 midterm elections approach, the issue of election monitoring is likely to remain a contentious topic, with both parties vying for control of the narrative surrounding the integrity of the voting process.
Comments (0)